|
Julie and Bob Hensley were diligent about getting their home
ready for sale. They ordered a pre-sale termite inspection
report. The report revealed that their large rear deck was
dry-rot infested, so they replaced it before putting their
home on the market.
The Hensleys also called a reputable roofer
to examine the roof and issue a report on its condition. The
roofer felt that the roof was on its last legs and that it
should be replaced. The Hensley's didn't want buyers to be put
off by a bad roof, so they had the roof replaced and the
exterior painted before they marketed the home.
The Hensley's home was attractive,
well-maintained and priced right for the market. It received
multiple offers the first week it was listed for sale.
But the buyers' inspection report indicated
that the house was in serious need of drainage work. According
to a drainage contractor, the job would cost in excess of
$20,000. Bob Hensley was particularly distraught because he'd
paid to have corrective drainage work done several years ago.
First-Time Tip: If you get
an alarming inspection report on a home you're buying or
selling, don't panic. Until you see the whole picture clearly,
you're not in a position to determine whether you have a major
problem to deal with or not.
What happened to the Hensleys is typical of
what can happen over time with older homes. The drainage work
that was completed years ago was probably adequate at the time.
But since then, there had been unprecedented rains in the area,
which caused flooding in many basements. Drainage technology had
advanced. New technology can be more expensive but often does a
better job.
The Hensleys considered calling in other
drainage experts to see if the work could be done for less.
After studying the buyers' inspection report, the contractor's
proposal and the buyers' offer to split the cost of the drainage
work 50-50 with the sellers, the Hensleys concluded that they
had a fair deal.
The solution is not always this easy,
especially when contractors can't agree. Keep in mind that there
is an element of subjectivity involved in the inspection
process. For example, two contractors might disagree on the
remedy for a dry-rotted window: one calling for repair and the
other for replacement.
Recently, one roofer recommended a total roof
replacement for a cost of $6,000. A second roofer disagreed. His
report said that the roof should last another three to four
years if the owner did $800 of maintenance work. Based on the
two reports, the buyers and sellers were able to negotiate a
satisfactory monetary solution to the problem for an amount that
was between the two estimates.
It's problematic when inspectors are wrong.
But it happens. Inspectors are only human. Here is another
example: A home inspector looked at a house and issued a report
condemning the furnace, which he said needed to be replaced.
The sellers called in a heating contractor
who declared that the furnace was fit and that it did not need
to be replaced.
The buyers were unsure about the furnace,
given the difference of opinions. The seller called in a
representative from the local gas company. The buyers knew that
the gas company representative would have to shut the furnace
down if it was dangerous. He found nothing wrong with the
furnace, and the buyers were satisfied.
In Closing:
Sometimes
finding the right expert to give an opinion on a suspected house
problem is the answer, but it is always good to get two
opinions.
If you Need a Good Home Inpsector in Southern California, we
recommend and
Antelope Valley Home Inspectors, LLC.
|